Effective December 1, 2011, Article 5 of Chapter 15A of the North Carolina General Statutes was amended by adding a new section, G.S. 15A-145.4, pursuant to which nonviolent felonies for first offenders who were under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime can be expunged off their records as long as certain requirements are met.

Generally, the fact that one was charged with a crime remains on their record regardless of the disposition of the charge, unless it gets expunged.

Expungement is a process by which criminal charges can be removed from ones official criminal record.

Regardless of ones age, cases in which the criminal charges were dismissed or a finding of not guilty was returned can be expunged pursuant to N.C.G.S. 15A-146.  In this case, offenses can be either a misdemeanor, a felony, or an infraction under G.S. 18B-302(i). However, one must not have any previous convictions of any felonies or misdemeanors other than traffic violations.

First offenders not over the age of 21 at the time of the offense, can also pursue an expungement if:

1.    They were charged with certain drug offenses which were dismissed based on a Deferred Prosecution Agreement pursuant to N.C.G.S. 90-96(a).  (See N.C.G.S. 15A-145.2)

2.    They were charged with certain toxic vapors offenses which were dismissed based on a Deferred Prosecution Agreement pursuant to N.C.G.S. 90-113.14(a) or (a1).  (see N.C.G.S. 15A-145.3)

First offenders under the age of 18 at the time of the offense however can even get charges expunged of their record of which they were convicted.  Until the amendment of the North Carolina expungement laws enacted by The General Assembly of North Carolina went in effect on December 1, 2011, the list of eligible convictions were exclusive of felony charges other than Class H felonies under Article 13A of Chapter 14 or enhanced charges under N.C.G.S. 14-50.22 (certain gang offenses).  However, now one can even get “nonviolent felony” charges expunged. “Nonviolent Felony” means for purposes of this section any felony except the following:

1.    A Class A through G felony.
2.    A felony that includes assault as an essential element of the offense.
3.    A felony that is an offense for which the convicted offender must register under Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes.
4.    A felony that is an offense that did not require registration under Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes at the time of the commission of the offense but does require registration on the date the petition to expunge the offense would be filed.
5.     A felony charged for any of the following sex-related or stalking offenses: G.S. 14-27.7A(b), 14-190.6, 14-190.7, 14-190.8, 14-202, 14-208.11A, 14-208.18, 14-277.3A, 14-321.1.
6.    Any felony offense charged pursuant to Chapter 90 of the General Statutes where the offense involves methamphetamines, heroin, or possession with intent to sell or deliver or sell and deliver cocaine.
7.    A felony offense charged pursuant to G.S. 14-12.12(b), 14-12.13, or 14-12.14, or any offense charged as a felony pursuant to G.S. 14-3(c).
8.    A felony offense charged pursuant to G.S. 14-401.16.
9.    A felony offense in which a commercial motor vehicle was used in the commission of the offense.

If you feel you may be eligible to pursue an expungement in New Hanover, Pender, or Brunswick Counties, North Carolina, call Collins Law Firm for a consultation at (910) 793-9000.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Effective January 1, 2012, Article 2 of Chapter 20 of the North Carolina General Statutes was amended by adding a new section introducing an immediate 30 day civil license revocation for provisional licensees.  Pursuant to General Statute 20-13.3(a)(4) a provisional licensee is defined as a person under the age of 18 who has a limited learner’s permit, a limited provisional license, or a full provisional license issued pursuant to G.S. 20-11.

Pursuant to this new law, a license revocation can be triggered by common offenses such as Speeding more than 15 mph over the limit or more than 80 mph in a 70 mph zone, Reckless Driving, Speeding to Elude Arrest, Aggressive Driving, Failing to move over for law enforcement or emergency vehicles giving a warning signal.  A complete list of criminal moving violations subjecting a provisional licensee’s permit or license to revocation can be found on page two of the affidavit and revocation report newly issued by the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts to be used for law enforcement officers (new AOC-CVR-12).

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(d) the provisional licensee must be given  a copy of the revocation order (new AOC-CVR-13) by the he judicial official which must state the date on which the provisional licensee’s permit or license becomes valid again.  The provisional licensee keeps their license or permit, however, they are not authorized to drive during the revocation period.

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(f), a  provisional licensee who is subject to a civil license revocation under this new law is not eligible for a limited driving privilege.

At the conclusion of the revocation period the person’s permit or license becomes valid by operation of law—payment of a fee is not required.

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(h) no driver’s license or insurance surcharge may be assessed for a provisional licensee revocation pursuant to the this new law.

A provisional licensee who drives a motor vehicle on a highway during the period of revocation under G.S. 20-13.3 commits the offense of driving while license revoked under G.S. 20-28.

Collins Law Firm has been representing people charged with traffic citations, speeding tickets, and other criminal charges in Southeast North Carolina for over ten years and we will be happy to discuss your situation with you. Feel free to call for a consultation regarding any legal matters for which you need legal representation at (910) 793-9000.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

North Carolina General Statute Section § 15A-304 provides that: A judicial official may issue a warrant for arrest only when he is supplied with sufficient information, supported by oath or affirmation, to make an independent judgment that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed it. The information must be shown by one or more of the following: Affidavit;  Oral testimony under oath or affirmation before the issuing official, etc.

Just because someone swears out a warrant against a person does not mean the person is guilty. In each of the United States, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Criminal charges, even if dismissed in court, can result in criminal records which will affect the accused for the rest of their life. Even if the criminal records are expunged, it is possible that records may still exist of the charges.  See:  http://www.attydc.com/Articles/Expungement/

Recently, the Wilmington Star News (the main newspaper in New Hanover County, NC) ran a story on North Carolina’s laws on self initiated warrants.  The story commented on several high profile cases including the recent warrant that Belville Mayor Jack Batson took out on Belville Commissioner Joe Breault for communicating threats and cyberstalking. Commissioner Breault had allegedly written an email to Mayer Batson in which he said that if he got out of hand again, “you may likely find your words rammed back down your throat and, along with your new teeth, pulled out of your rectum!”  The article said Batson indicated that he felt compelled to swear out a warrant against Breault since the threats were escalating, but Breault the agreed that the system with self initiated warrants in North Carolina is abused. He said specifically that he has examples of instances where young people threaten to have their lovers arrested if they misbehave.

In 2003, a Kure Beach resident swore out a warrant against actor Ben Affleck for communicating threats.  The warrant was subsequently dismissed.  The District Attorney at the time said that the case was “a very good example of why people shouldn’t be able to take out a warrant without any kind of police investigation.”

The Star News article discussed the processes in other states including Georgia where individuals requesting a warrant must go before a magistrate who holds a hearing where both the accuser and accused are given a chance to present evidence before the judicial officer makes a decision. What followed was the standard three-step process that unfolds thousands of times each year in magistrates’ offices across North Carolina: Batson filled out a one-page form, listing his complaint. He put his hand on a Bible, swearing his claims were true. And then, the magistrate issued a warrant for the commissioner’s arrest.

In the vast majority of other states, there are other professionals involved in the criminal justice system investigating criminal complaints before a warrant is issued.  The Star news quoted Jeffrey Welty, Assistant Professor at the UNC School of Government who has said:  It’s a distinctive feature of North Carolina law. . . . I haven’t surveyed all 50 states, but if we’re not unique, we’re pretty close.

How much is a companion pet worth? This is the question that is being asked in regards to the death of Laci, a Jack Russel Terrier of a Wilmington couple. Laci died in 2007 after veterinarians at NC State inserted a feeding tube in her trachea instead of her esophagus, causing Laci to drown over several hours. The Sheras filed a complaint in 2009 against the NC State Veterinary School, two veterinary residents and an intern who treated Laci. The couple accused them of malpractice. In their lawsuit the Sheras question whether the residents had the proper supervision while working in the intensive care unit.

The Sheras, Laci’s owners, are fighting a legal battle with the state over how much they are entitled from Laci’s death. The value of a companion animal is being calculated at the fair market value of replacing the animal which is not in line with the value that Americans place onto pets. Many state laws view animals as being a piece of property instead of another member of the family. There is an argument against this view based upon the legal system’s valuation of a companion animal not being in line with what an average pet owner is willing to spend in veterinary bills.

The Sheras have been fighting this view of compensation and the rights of animal owners over the loss or injury of an animal caused by another. The State estimates the cost of replacing Laci is only $350 based upon market value. The Sheras’ attorney argues that they are entitled to more than $350, that they should be compensated for more than $28,000, which was the cost of Laci’s cancer treatments at NC State.

The Sheras have made statements about this lawsuit not being about the money, but rather about this being justice for Laci and trying to change the system. They are hoping to change the law so that no other family or pet has to go through what they have been through.

On January 23rd, 2012, the Sheras’ case made it to the North Carolina state Court of Appeals but the decision is not expected for at least a few months. The Sheras’ case is just one of the recent court cases that essentially treat animals as human under the law. The United States Courts are deciding against centuries of legal decisions that have defined animals as property. In recent years Judges in 25 states have administered financial trusts set up in pets’ names as well as courts in New York, Maryland and Texas resolving custody disputes involving pets by deciding what’s best for the pet. The Courts have begun to take claims of veterinary malpractice seriously as well. Courts in Kentucky and California have awarded damages to pet owners for the loss of companionship, emotional distress and other factors that go beyond the assessed animal’s worth based upon their market value.

By Samantha Barringer, Intern at Collins Law Firm

Effective for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2011 the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina has enacted a new, additional court cost specific to impaired driving offenses, which took effect on December 1, 2011.

Unlike most changes to court costs which were enacted during the past years and which typically took effect for costs assessed or collected on or after the effective date of the enacting legislation, this cost applies only to convictions for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2011. The fee may not be assessed for offenses committed prior to that date.

The new fee of $100 is to be assessed in addition to all other costs applicable to the case; it does not replace any other costs. E.g., it is assessed in addition to the Chapter 20 fee of G.S. 7A-304(a)(4b), not in lieu of it. The cost is to be assessed only upon conviction, so the fee should not be assessed unless the defendant is convicted of one of the following offenses:  Impaired driving, G.S. 20-138.1; Impaired driving in commercial vehicle, G.S. 20-138.2; Operating a commercial vehicle after consuming alcohol (second or subsequent convictions, only), G.S. 20-138.2A; and Operating a school bus, activity bus, or child care vehicle after consuming alcohol (second or subsequent convictions, only), G.S. 20-138.2B.

Because it is a court cost under G.S. 7A-304, waiver of this fee requires that the court make a finding of just cause for the waiver, pursuant to G.S 7A-304(a).

Collins Law Firm regularly represents people charged with impaired driving offenses with court appearances in New Hanover, Pender, and Brunswick County.  If you were charged, you should contact a lawyer or attorney at Collins Law Firm at 910-793-9000 for a consultation.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

The road construction around Wilmington, North Carolina is supposed to ease traffic and pedestrian flow while improving the infrastructures of the city.  In the mean time the road closures and construction zones have been causing delays and traffic congestion.  In particular the construction on 3^rd Street in downtown Wilmington has been causing delays for those traveling into and out of downtown.

The construction and improvement project on 3^rd street in downtown Wilmington began in August and the project duration is expected to last for 13 months.  The project budget is $9.4 million, which was funded through a 2006 bond referendum.  The project is located from the stretch of road from Market Street to Davis Street and reflects the similar improvement projects on Front Street.  There are expected delays and slow downs due to the construction and renovation improvements.  There has already been one delay with the improvement project within the first few weeks of the project.  The delay is due to the discovery of an underground shelter with four storage tanks that are in the way of the new water and sewer lines that are being installed.  The old tanks contain liquids such as gas and oil, which require an environmental engineer to remove them which will cost $15,000 each to remove.  The money to remove the old tanks will come out of the project’s contingency fund and while the discovery of the tanks has delayed the project there is an expectation for it to be completed by September 2012.

The reason for this project is due to the aging water and sewer pipes that run underneath 3^rd street and to convert overhead utilities to run underground.  The above ground construction is to renovate the streetscape during the underground construction in order to minimize the disruption that will be caused during the construction period.

These renovations and updates are necessary due to various reasons.  The overhead utilities are being moved underground to reduce the potential for damage and to improve the aesthetics of the downtown cityscape.  The water and sewer pumps that run under 3^rd street are up to 100 years old in certain areas.  The traffic flow is planned to be improved through making downtown more accessible and pedestrian-friendly through improving the road which is considered a major gateway into the city.

Work hours expected for this project are 7 am until 6 pm, Mondays through Fridays with some construction on nights and weekends as deemed necessary.  Expect delays from lane closures on the west side of 3^rd street that have been extended to the Grace street intersection with no parking zones having been extended to the north of the Walnut Street intersection.  There are no left turns allowed off of 3^rd Street at Princess, Chestnut and Grace Streets with a detour for motorists to use 5^th Avenue.  Intersections along 3^rd Street may be closed as necessary.  Pedestrian access and walkways will be moved from in front of buildings as necessary with some temporary structures.

Updates on the construction and delays can be found at wilmingtonnc.gov/north3rd and on the city’s Facebook page.

Written by Samantha Barringer – Intern with Collins Law Firm

There is a large debate over the legality and rights of same sex marriage and whether it is a constitutionally given right.  While it is up to the fifty states to decide whether same sex marriage is legal, there is a large debate occurring in our nation about whether it should be legal.  Some people are against same sex marriage for religious reasons or cultural reasons.  There is a clause in the US Constitution known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which states that all of the States within the United States must respect the “public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.”  The clause is Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.  This clause was created to ensure that decisions made by a judicial system in one state are recognized and honored in every other state.

Since the Full Faith and Credit Clause is a part of the US Constitution, some think that when one state legalizes same sex marriage, that other states are bound to honor those marriages that are produced from that state.  Those opposing same sex marriage are against honoring any marriage certificate from a same sex marriage based upon passing constitutional amendments and acts passed by Congress.

The State of North Carolina does not recognize same sex marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act, which was passed by Congress in 1996.  This act defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman. While same sex marriage is already considered illegal in North Carolina, some members of the North Carolina Legislature want to pass an amendment to the North Carolina Constitution that would prohibit any legal recognition of same sex partners, including prohibiting private companies from allowing same sex couples from enjoying insurance benefits, retirement pay outs, and other benefits provided to married couples.  This amendment would make it a difficult task for future legislature to overturn the ban on same sex marriage.

The North Carolina legislature has deemed same sex marriage to be illegal and that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. The recent bill to create an amendment to ban same sex marriage shows that there is a strong desire among many members of the new republican legislature to prevent same sex marriage from ever being considered legal in the state of North Carolina in the future.

Written by Samantha Barringer – Intern with Collins Law Firm

Americans were not discouraged by high gas prices, which at $3.77 a gallon was one dollar a gallon higher compared to last year, and took to the road this past weekend in enormous numbers to celebrate Memorial Day Weekend.  According to a  AAA report 34.9 million travelers journeyed at least 50 miles from home, which was an increase of 100,000 travelers compared to the same weekend last year.  The report declared that 41 percent of the people traveling in the South Atlantic region went to a beach.

In North Carolina that meant that people came to our beautiful beaches up and down the coast.  North Carolinians spent the holiday weekend at the beaches in Pender County, New Hanover County, and Brunswick County.  The beaches in our area that saw a dramatic rise in population this past weekend was Surf City, Topsail Beach, Wrightsville Beach, Kure Beach, Carolina Beach, Holden Beach, Ocean Isle Beach, and Sunset Beach.

The increase in driving led to more dangerous conditions on the roads.  The roadways going to and from the beaches had many traffic jams because so many people descended on the beaches in our part of the state.  In addition to more cars clogging the roads, people were more likely to be drinking and driving.  The North Carolina Highway Patrol announced that at least nine motorists died during the Memorial Day Weekend.  Last year, eleven motorists died and 358 people were injured in car accidents.

The Star News (Major newspaper in Wilmington, NC) published before the holiday weekend that the Wilmington Police Department would host a multi-agency traffic checking station on Sunday afternoon and evenings.  Officers involved in the operation will target impaired driving as well as underage possession of alcohol, open containers of alcohol, or failure to use seatbelts.  It is highly recommended to find experienced attorneys or lawyers to help you if you were caught in one of these checkpoints.

If you were hurt in a car accident, or you were charged with any crime or issued a traffic citation during the Memorial Day Weekend in or around Wilmington, NC scheduled for court in New Hanover County, Brunswick County (Bolivia, NC), or Pender County (Burgaw, NC), you should contact a lawyer or attorney at Collins Law Firm at 910-793-9000 for a consultation.

It is prom season here in Southeastern North Carolina. Teenagers at high schools in New Hanover, Brunswick, and Pender Counties will soon be dancing the night away at their junior and senior proms in celebration of yet another school year coming to a close.  However, prom has become a time that some underage high school students are likely to excessively drink.  This has led to an increase in underage drinking charges, teenagers using fraudulent driver’s licenses, and DUI/DWI’s.  Additionally, underage individuals will attempt to have a family member or friend who is older than 21 purchase alcohol for them.  North Carolina is taking steps to make it more difficult for underage individuals to get their hands on alcohol, and has introduced a vertical driver’s license for anyone under the age of 21.  Moreover, North Carolina driver’s licenses have a hologram on them, which is a security feature that makes it more difficult to copy.  In a lot of cases underage drinkers try to get around that by obtaining fake IDs from out of state.

Before you consider drinking for your prom or buying alcohol for a friend it is important to know the laws of the State of North Carolina.  Convictions of the laws concerning the sale, possession, and consumption of alcoholic beverages outlined in N.C.G.S. Chapter 18B named “Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages,” will lead to a punishment of a class one (maximum of 120 days in jail) or class two misdemeanor (maximum of 60 days in jail).  Furthermore, it is possible that a conviction will lead to your driver’s license being revoked for one year.

N.C.G.S Chapter 18B states that it is unlawful for a person under the age of 21  to buy, attempt to buy, or to possess fortified wine, spirituous liquor, or mixed beverages. It is unlawful for a person under 21 to consume any alcoholic beverage.  If you are underage and you purchase alcohol for another person you shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.  If you are over 21 and purchase alcohol for someone that is younger than 21 you can be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.  Additionally it is unlawful to use a fraudulent or fake drivers license or other identification document to purchase alcoholic beverages.  Further, any person who permits the use of their driver’s license will be held accountable.

However, just because you have been charged with underage drinking or any violation of the NC alcohol laws, or any law, does not necessarily mean you will be convicted.  Collins Law Firm has represented many people charged with violating the laws concerning the sale, possession, and consumption of alcohol.  In most cases, especially for first time offenders, we have been able to prevent convictions.  Presently, in most cases for first time offenders, even if there is no solid defense, we are able to negotiate an agreement with the district attorney’s office to have the charges dismissed after the defendant completes a certain number of hours of volunteer service, or completing a class about alcohol and the laws regarding alcohol, or other requirements, or a combination thereof. When there is a solid defense, we normally are able to have the charges dismissed without our clients having to perform any volunteer service or complete classes.

If you have been charged with underage drinking, a DWI / DUI, or any other crime in or around Wilmington, NC in New Hanover County, Brunswick County (Bolivia, NC), or Pender County (Burgaw, NC) and need a lawyer or attorney to represent you call Collins Law Firm at: 910-793-9000 for a confidential consultation.

Jon David, the District Attorney in Brunswick, Bladen, and Columbus Counties (with county seats Bolivia, NC, Elizabethtown, NC, and Whiteville, NC respectively) filed a petition with the state appeals court yesterday, Thursday, May 19, 2011 appealing the Chief District Court Judge’s administrative order which halted the traffic court program in the district.  The District Attorney, Jon David, also filed a request for a temporary stay.  Dick Ellis, a spokesman for the North Carolina Court of Appeals, said a ruling could be issued as early as this week.  “That would make his order dead in the water right now until they can rule whether they want to overrule him permanently,” Ellis said. Ellis said that the court’s final decision may be issued in the next two weeks.  The controversy between the District Attorney and the Chief District Court Judge has been brewing for over a month now.

The fifth prosecutorial district in North Carolina is comprised of New Hanover and Pender Counties, of which the county seats are Wilmington, NC, and Burgaw, NC, respectively.  The thirteenth prosecutorial district and the fifth prosecutorial district are adjacent geographically, and separated by the Cape Fear River, located in the southeast corner of North Carolina on the coast of the Atlantic Ocean.  These two prosecutorial districts are unique in the fact that the elected district attorneys in these districts are brothers, and identical twins.  The brothers are Ben David and Jon David – both lawyers who have served as prosecutors at times independently, and at times in the same office, for many years.  We are not aware of any other pair of prosecutorial districts anywhere that are served by identical twins.