(910) 793-9000
(910) 793-9000
5725-F2 Oleander Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
 

Collins Law Firm :: Blog

Author Archive

Holiday Season – Booze It & Lose It

Tuesday, December 18th, 2012

The holiday season is in full swing and so is the North Carolina “Booze It & Lose It” Campaign, created by State Transportation Secretary Gene Conti in an effort to remove impaired drivers from the road and keep our citizens safe. Checkpoints and increased patrol began on December 6th and will continue through January 2, 2013, to help reduce the rising number of alcohol related crashes, injuries and fatalities state wide.

Driving while under the influence is a violation of North Carolina General Statute § 20-138.1

N.C.G.S. § 20-138.1.  Impaired driving.
(a)        Offense. – A person commits the offense of impaired driving if he drives any vehicle upon any highway, any street, or any public vehicular area within this State:
(1)        While under the influence of an impairing substance; or
(2)        After having consumed sufficient alcohol that he has, at any relevant time after the driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. The results of a chemical analysis shall be deemed sufficient evidence to prove a person’s alcohol concentration; or
(3)        With any amount of a Schedule I controlled substance, as listed in G.S. 90-89, or its metabolites in his blood or urine.
(a1)      A person who has submitted to a chemical analysis of a blood sample, pursuant to G.S. 20-139.1(d), may use the result in rebuttal as evidence that the person did not have, at a relevant time after driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.

Last year, 3,600 North Carolina Drivers were charged with DUI / DWI during the month long holiday campaign and that number is expected to increase this year. Not only does drinking and driving put you at risk of getting arrested at a checkpoint or during a traffic stop, it puts your life and the lives of others in danger.  In fact, drunk drivers with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08, the legal limit, are 11 times more likely than a sober driver to be in a motor vehicle accident. This likelihood increases with the increase of the BAC level.  With odds like that, why risk it?

In 2011, there were more than 950 alcohol related crashes in North Carolina during the “Booze It & Lose It” Campaign spanning from December 3rd – January 3rd. Those 950 crashes resulted in 44 fatalities and 702 injuries- some of which were innocent victims and not the drunk driver themselves.

If you find yourself questioning weather you had too much eggnog at your office holiday party, don’t risk getting arrested or worse, endangering your life or the lives of others. Play it safe and call a cab or have a sober friend take you home.  If you or someone you know have any legal needs this holiday season call Collins Law Firm at (910) 793- 9000(910) 793- 9000.

By Lauren Seidel, Paralegal

Texting While Driving

Wednesday, December 12th, 2012

Over the past twenty years, cell phones have become an essential part of day to day life for many Americans. Cell phones continue to provide us with the convenience to communicate while on the go, comfort in knowing we have a way to call for help in case of an emergency, and access to music, games and entertainment.  Cell phones can make life easier, but when used irresponsibly, can have disastrous consequences.

Answering a text takes away your attention for about five second. That is enough time to travel the length of a football field. We know it is dangerous, but many of us continue to send or receive text messages while driving thinking that nothing will happen to them. But according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, text messaging while driving makes a car crash 23 times more likely and 1.3 million auto collisions involved cell phones last year.

Unfortunately, about 6,000 deaths and about 500,000 injuries are caused by distracted drivers every year.  In response to the rapid increase in texting while driving fatalities, 39 states, including North Carolina have passed laws prohibiting all drivers from texting while driving. Texting while driving is a violation of the North Carolina General Statute §20-137.4A.

N.C.G.S. §20-137.4A Unlawful use of mobile telephone for text messaging or electronic mail
(a) Offense. – It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a vehicle on a public street or highway or public vehicular area while using a mobile telephone to:
(1) Manually enter multiple letters or text in the device as a means of communicating with another person; or
(2) Read any electronic mail or text message transmitted to the device or stored within the device, provided that this prohibition shall not apply to any name or number stored in the device nor to any caller identification information.
(b) Exceptions. – The provisions of this section shall not apply to:
(1) The operator of a vehicle that is lawfully parked or stopped.
(2) Any of the following while in the performance of their official duties: a law enforcement officer; a member of a fire department; or the operator of a public or private ambulance.
(3) The use of factory-installed or aftermarket global positioning systems (GPS) or wireless communications devices used to transmit or receive data as part of a digital dispatch system.
(4) The use of voice operated technology.
(c) Penalty. – A violation of this section while operating a school bus, as defined in G.S. 20-137.4(a)(4), shall be a Class 2 misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00). Any other violation of this section shall be an infraction and shall be punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00) and the costs of court.

A texting while driving charge will not cause you to receive any drivers license points or insurance surcharges, however the charge will appear on your North Carolina DMV record unless you are able to have the charge dismissed. If you or someone you know has received a ticket for texting while driving, call Collins Law Firm for a free consultation at 910-793-9000910-793-9000.

By Lauren Seidel, Paralegal

Thanksgiving Travel

Tuesday, November 20th, 2012

The first Thanksgiving was celebrated in 1621 to commemorate a bountiful harvest in the Plymouth Colony. Americans have kept that tradition alive throughout the years, gathering with friends and family on the fourth Thursday of November to eat, drink, watch football, and of course, stay up all night to get the best deals on holiday shopping. While the meaning behind this holiday has remained the same over the years- to celebrate the things we have to be thankful for- the Colonists and Native Americans did not encounter two issues that Thanksgiving and the holiday season bring us today- an increase in traffic and an increase in drinking and driving.

According to AAA, this turkey day is going to be a busy one for travel.  More than 43 million Americans will travel at least 50 miles over the Thanksgiving holiday period and 90% of travelers will be driving to their Thanksgiving destination. That means congested highways, frustrated drivers, and vigilant law enforcement.

Help ease your travel woes this Thanksgiving by following a few simple guidelines:
•    Considering traveling on a less busy travel day-the Wednesday before and the Sunday after Thanksgiving are the two worst.
•     Don’t give into the temptation to speed. It won’t get you there much faster and it can lead to a ticket or worse, a collision.
•    Wear your seat belt: Police will also be looking for seat belt violators and wearing your seat belt during an accident may mean the difference between life and death.
•    Don’t text and drive. Taking your eyes off the road for just a second or two can have tragic consequences.
•    Understand that traffic will be heavy and don’t let your frustrations tempt you to take chances. Keep your family’s safety your number one priority.

The night before Thanksgiving is also one of the busiest bar nights of the year, combined with the high number of travelers on the road, can have tragic consequences. This may be why Thanksgiving has the most drunk driving related fatalities of any other holiday. Law enforcement will be on high alert, in an effort to keep citizens safe.  Don’t put yourself at risk of getting a DUI/DWI or worse, harming yourself or others in an alcohol related accident.

Go ahead and stuff yourself with turkey and pumpkin pie, have a few drinks and be merry. But please, take your time in the holiday traffic and if you drink, don’t drive- take a cab or have a designated driver. Remember, if you do receive a traffic ticket, get into a fender bender, serious accident, or receive a DUI/DWI this holiday season, call us at (910) 793-9000(910) 793-9000. Stay safe Wilmington!

By Lauren Seidel, Paralegal

Operation Stop Arm – Efforts to Increase School Bus Safety

Tuesday, October 16th, 2012

In an effort to increase the safety of our children, the North Carolina Highway Patrol launched Operation Stop Arm week yesterday, October 15, 2012 at 6:00 a.m. and will go through the end of school Friday, October 19, 2012.  They will enforce stop arm violations and other traffic violations in and around school zones aggressively.

Troopers will be observing drivers in school zones and following school busses in marked and unmarked cars statewide during this week.

Keep in mind what you are and are not allowed to do with respect to a stopped school bus:

•    Two-lane road – Everyone must stop
•    Four-lane road with no separation – Everyone must stop
•    Four-lane or more with a median or some physical barrier – Only traffic following the bus must stop
•    Center turn lane with less than four lanes – Everyone must stop
•    Center turn lane with at least four other lanes – Only traffic following the bus must stop

Passing a stopped school bus is a Class 1 misdemeanor.  The maximum punishment for a Class 1 misdemeanor conviction is 120 days prison/jail time.   In addition, upon conviction of passing a stopped school bus one receives five driving points on their North Carolina driver’s license and is subject to fines up to $200.   Furthermore, if—while passing a stopped school bus—one strikes an individual, one faces a maximum punishment of 15 months jail/prison time, because this is a Class I Felony.  If—while passing a stopped school bus and striking an individual—one causes a death, one faces a maximum punishment of 30 months jail/prison time, because this is a Class H felony.

Collins Law Firm has handled thousands of traffic tickets for our clients and, in most cases, we were able to avoid suspensions.  Furthermore, for most simple tickets (speeding violations, passing stopped school bus, illegal passing, etc.), our clients do not even need to go to court. We offer free phone consultations for most traffic matters. If you need advice or information about representation for a traffic violation or in a hearing regarding a scheduled suspension of your North Carolina driver’s license, call us at: 910-793-9000.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

North Carolina Unemployment Claims

Monday, August 20th, 2012

Filing a claim for unemployment requires contacting the North Carolina’s Employment Security Commission (ESC). The benefits you may qualify for depends on how long the employee was employed and how much they were paid.  Unemployment benefits usually range from $41 to $476 a week. To be qualified, an employee must have been separated from their job through no fault of their own and have worked for at least two of the first four quarters of the last five calendar quarters. Additionally, unemployed claimant must be actively engaged in looking for new employment. Employers must pay for a portion of an employee’s unemployment.  When determining if an employee is eligible to receive unemployment, the ESC contacts the former employer to determine why an employee lost their job. While layoffs are usually straightforward, disputes often arise when there is disagreement over whether an employee was fired for misconduct, forced to resign, or suffered some sort of retaliation from their employer.

Willful Misconduct in Unemployment Claims

In general, terminated employees are eligible for unemployment benefits, but not when willful misconduct on the part of the former employee lead to their being fired. What actually constitutes “willful misconduct,” however, can be contested.

Unemployment Claims Hearings

If a former employee is determined to be ineligible for unemployment benefits in the initial decision, they can appeal. A hearing, either live or by telephone, will be scheduled before a Referee to determine whether or not a former employee should receive benefits. Subpoenas can be issued for witnesses and evidence may be presented to support a claim that discrimination or retaliation was involved in the decision to fire the employee. Employers can also be liable for wrongful termination and may find themselves facing civil litigation and an investigation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Collins Law Firm can review a claimant’s case in order to form an opinion about whether the decision of the ESC is justified given the circumstances surrounding an employee leaving a job. We can advocate our client’s position by providing documentation that supports the claim and increase the likelihood of prevailing.   If you wish to have a confidential consultation, call us at 910-793-9000.

Booze It & Lose It

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012

On July 4, 2012, we will celebrate the 236th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain.  Many Americans consume alcohol during this celebration.

While enjoying good times with friends and family we may not forget the tragic and sobering consequences that can result by driving while impaired.

To deter drunk drivers across the entire state and remove impaired drivers from the roads, local law enforcement agencies from across the state will join the Governor’s Highway Safety Program “Booze It & Lose It: Operation Firecracker” which began Friday, June 29, and continues through Sunday, July 8.  Law enforcement agencies will increase their presence at the beaches in Pender, New Hanover, and Brunswick Counties.  This will effect Surf City, Topsail Beach, Wrightsville Beach, Kure Beach, Carolina Beach, Holden Beach, Ocean Isle Beach, and Sunset Beach.

Collins Law Firm always urges people not to drive while impaired.  If you consume alcohol, we encourage you to have a designated driver or to take a taxi home.  However, if you are charged with a DWI/DUI, underage drinking, or any other crime in or around Wilmington, NC in New Hanover County, Brunswick County (Bolivia, NC), or Pender County (Burgaw, NC) and need a lawyer or attorney to represent you, call Collins Law Firm at: 910-793-9000910-793-9000 for a confidential consultation.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Will Minor League Baseball Come to Wilmington?

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

As the first Opening Day in 33 years without a Kinston, N.C., franchise in the Carolina League approaches, another longtime league member may also be on the way out.

The Lynchburg Hillcats, based in Lynchburg Virginia, which have been a part of the Carolina League since 1966, may be moving to Wilmington, N.C.  The Lynchburg metro area had a population of around 245,000 in 2010, compared to Wilmington’s approximate 360,000.

The Hillcats’ owners have reached a tentative agreement to sell the franchise to a joint partnership with the Atlanta Braves and Mandalay Baseball Properties. It may be possible that the move could be completed for an opening game for the 2014 season.  The biggest hurdle for the deal to be completed is construction of a baseball stadium in New Hanover County. The sale is contingent on the new park being built, and at this point the city of Wilmington does not know where the park would be or how it will be financed.  Mandalay Baseball CEO Art Matin said that without significant public financing, the deal won’t happen.

In February, 2012, the Wilmington, NC, city council unanimously approved to study the proposal. Proponents believe that the proposed stadium will bring significant increases to our local tourism industry. They say that it would be the area’s largest attraction adding that fans will come from outside the county bringing with them their money to spend boosting the area economy.

Wilmington’s mayor Bill Saffo has said that a new ballpark would require support from local residents.  Opponents of public financing for the stadium have circulated a petition to require a referendum on using public money for the project.

As of May, 2012 support for minor league baseball in Wilmington has grown.  Jim Hundley, Jr. is president of the Wilmington Ballpark Coalition  which was recently formed and he says his groups’ membership has steadily grown. He recently said that they currently have more than 60 members, and that they are expecting to grow to over 100 members very soon.  Hundley has told members he believes the project will provide a big boost to future economic development, citing as an example Durham, NC which experienced  $900 million growth in private and public investments after their stadium was constructed in the late 90s.

The Wilmington Area Hospitality Association which represents hotels, restaurants, and other local businesses conducted an online survey regarding the proposed baseball stadium in downtown Wilmington, and they reported that over 95 percent of its members said they supported the project.

On Wednesday, May 9, the City of Wilmington held its second public information meeting about bringing minor league baseball to New Hanover County, and turnout by the public was low.

There were more city staff members and members of local media than citizens at the meeting.  The meeting was an opportunity for the public to give input about where to build the stadium and if there is support for a tax increase to help fund the project. Issues such as costs, infrastructure requirements, and operating costs were addressed. Maybe the lack of public attention indicates a waning of opposition of the project.  The opponents had been very vocal in the past.  There is supposed to be another survey on the issue released on Friday.  In June, the project’s management group plans to present a feasibility study to the city council on potential locations and financing options for the stadium.

Expunction of “Nonviolent Felonies”

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Effective December 1, 2011, Article 5 of Chapter 15A of the North Carolina General Statutes was amended by adding a new section, G.S. 15A-145.4, pursuant to which nonviolent felonies for first offenders who were under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime can be expunged off their records as long as certain requirements are met.

Generally, the fact that one was charged with a crime remains on their record regardless of the disposition of the charge, unless it gets expunged.

Expungement is a process by which criminal charges can be removed from ones official criminal record.

Regardless of ones age, cases in which the criminal charges were dismissed or a finding of not guilty was returned can be expunged pursuant to N.C.G.S. 15A-146.  In this case, offenses can be either a misdemeanor, a felony, or an infraction under G.S. 18B-302(i). However, one must not have any previous convictions of any felonies or misdemeanors other than traffic violations.

First offenders not over the age of 21 at the time of the offense, can also pursue an expungement if:

1.    They were charged with certain drug offenses which were dismissed based on a Deferred Prosecution Agreement pursuant to N.C.G.S. 90-96(a).  (See N.C.G.S. 15A-145.2)

2.    They were charged with certain toxic vapors offenses which were dismissed based on a Deferred Prosecution Agreement pursuant to N.C.G.S. 90-113.14(a) or (a1).  (see N.C.G.S. 15A-145.3)

First offenders under the age of 18 at the time of the offense however can even get charges expunged of their record of which they were convicted.  Until the amendment of the North Carolina expungement laws enacted by The General Assembly of North Carolina went in effect on December 1, 2011, the list of eligible convictions were exclusive of felony charges other than Class H felonies under Article 13A of Chapter 14 or enhanced charges under N.C.G.S. 14-50.22 (certain gang offenses).  However, now one can even get “nonviolent felony” charges expunged. “Nonviolent Felony” means for purposes of this section any felony except the following:

1.    A Class A through G felony.
2.    A felony that includes assault as an essential element of the offense.
3.    A felony that is an offense for which the convicted offender must register under Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes.
4.    A felony that is an offense that did not require registration under Article 27A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes at the time of the commission of the offense but does require registration on the date the petition to expunge the offense would be filed.
5.     A felony charged for any of the following sex-related or stalking offenses: G.S. 14-27.7A(b), 14-190.6, 14-190.7, 14-190.8, 14-202, 14-208.11A, 14-208.18, 14-277.3A, 14-321.1.
6.    Any felony offense charged pursuant to Chapter 90 of the General Statutes where the offense involves methamphetamines, heroin, or possession with intent to sell or deliver or sell and deliver cocaine.
7.    A felony offense charged pursuant to G.S. 14-12.12(b), 14-12.13, or 14-12.14, or any offense charged as a felony pursuant to G.S. 14-3(c).
8.    A felony offense charged pursuant to G.S. 14-401.16.
9.    A felony offense in which a commercial motor vehicle was used in the commission of the offense.

If you feel you may be eligible to pursue an expungement in New Hanover, Pender, or Brunswick Counties, North Carolina, call Collins Law Firm for a consultation at (910) 793-9000.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Teen Drivers – Immediate 30 Day Civil License Revocation for Certain Offenses

Friday, April 20th, 2012

Effective January 1, 2012, Article 2 of Chapter 20 of the North Carolina General Statutes was amended by adding a new section introducing an immediate 30 day civil license revocation for provisional licensees.  Pursuant to General Statute 20-13.3(a)(4) a provisional licensee is defined as a person under the age of 18 who has a limited learner’s permit, a limited provisional license, or a full provisional license issued pursuant to G.S. 20-11.

Pursuant to this new law, a license revocation can be triggered by common offenses such as Speeding more than 15 mph over the limit or more than 80 mph in a 70 mph zone, Reckless Driving, Speeding to Elude Arrest, Aggressive Driving, Failing to move over for law enforcement or emergency vehicles giving a warning signal.  A complete list of criminal moving violations subjecting a provisional licensee’s permit or license to revocation can be found on page two of the affidavit and revocation report newly issued by the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts to be used for law enforcement officers (new AOC-CVR-12).

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(d) the provisional licensee must be given  a copy of the revocation order (new AOC-CVR-13) by the he judicial official which must state the date on which the provisional licensee’s permit or license becomes valid again.  The provisional licensee keeps their license or permit, however, they are not authorized to drive during the revocation period.

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(f), a  provisional licensee who is subject to a civil license revocation under this new law is not eligible for a limited driving privilege.

At the conclusion of the revocation period the person’s permit or license becomes valid by operation of law—payment of a fee is not required.

Pursuant to G.S. 20-13.3(h) no driver’s license or insurance surcharge may be assessed for a provisional licensee revocation pursuant to the this new law.

A provisional licensee who drives a motor vehicle on a highway during the period of revocation under G.S. 20-13.3 commits the offense of driving while license revoked under G.S. 20-28.

Collins Law Firm has been representing people charged with traffic citations, speeding tickets, and other criminal charges in Southeast North Carolina for over ten years and we will be happy to discuss your situation with you. Feel free to call for a consultation regarding any legal matters for which you need legal representation at (910) 793-9000.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Self Initiated Warrants in North Carolina

Monday, March 26th, 2012

North Carolina General Statute Section § 15A-304 provides that: A judicial official may issue a warrant for arrest only when he is supplied with sufficient information, supported by oath or affirmation, to make an independent judgment that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed it. The information must be shown by one or more of the following: Affidavit;  Oral testimony under oath or affirmation before the issuing official, etc.

Just because someone swears out a warrant against a person does not mean the person is guilty. In each of the United States, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Criminal charges, even if dismissed in court, can result in criminal records which will affect the accused for the rest of their life. Even if the criminal records are expunged, it is possible that records may still exist of the charges.

Recently, the Wilmington Star News (the main newspaper in New Hanover County, NC) ran a story on North Carolina’s laws on self initiated warrants.  The story commented on several high profile cases including the recent warrant that Belville Mayor Jack Batson took out on Belville Commissioner Joe Breault for communicating threats and cyberstalking. Commissioner Breault had allegedly written an email to Mayer Batson in which he said that if he got out of hand again, “you may likely find your words rammed back down your throat and, along with your new teeth, pulled out of your rectum!”  The article said Batson indicated that he felt compelled to swear out a warrant against Breault since the threats were escalating, but Breault the agreed that the system with self initiated warrants in North Carolina is abused. He said specifically that he has examples of instances where young people threaten to have their lovers arrested if they misbehave.

In 2003, a Kure Beach resident swore out a warrant against actor Ben Affleck for communicating threats.  The warrant was subsequently dismissed.  The District Attorney at the time said that the case was “a very good example of why people shouldn’t be able to take out a warrant without any kind of police investigation.”

The Star News article discussed the processes in other states including Georgia where individuals requesting a warrant must go before a magistrate who holds a hearing where both the accuser and accused are given a chance to present evidence before the judicial officer makes a decision. What followed was the standard three-step process that unfolds thousands of times each year in magistrates’ offices across North Carolina: Batson filled out a one-page form, listing his complaint. He put his hand on a Bible, swearing his claims were true. And then, the magistrate issued a warrant for the commissioner’s arrest.

In the vast majority of other states, there are other professionals involved in the criminal justice system investigating criminal complaints before a warrant is issued.  The Star news quoted Jeffrey Welty, Assistant Professor at the UNC School of Government who has said:  It’s a distinctive feature of North Carolina law. . . . I haven’t surveyed all 50 states, but if we’re not unique, we’re pretty close.