The New Hanover County Courthouse located in Wilmington, NC is closed today, Thursday March 8, 2012, because of an infestation of bed bugs! Courthouse personnel said they noticed some bed bugs in the building and notified the New Hanover County division of Property Management.

Bed bugs have been a human parasite for thousands of years. In the 1940s, bedbugs were mostly eradicated in the developed world.  However, since the mid1990’s, bedbugs have increased in numbers Infestation of human habitats has been increasing, and bed bug bites and the effects thereof have been increasing as well.

An exterminator is scheduled to try to kill all of the pests today by fumigating the building .  We have learned that other facilities will be used for court business with urgency.  Emergency protective orders and civil filings will be handled at the Juvenile Clerk’s Office located at 133 North Fourth Street, Superior Court will be relocated to the Old Courthouse located next door to the main courthouse at 24 North Third Street, and warrants can be sworn out at the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office on Blue Clay Road.  Jerome Fennell, Director of NHC Property Management, said that “County staff are working closely with exterminators to ensure the facility will be ready for normal operations on Friday.” Whether they will be successful remains to be seen.  Samantha Dooies, assistant to District Attorney Ben David said that blood-sucking bed bugs can be very difficult to eradicate.

An announcement is expected later today about the success of the eradication efforts.  The staff and attorneys at Collins Law Firm certainly hope that those working on the problem are thorough and successful!  The courthouse is full of hardworking people who already have a hard enough time getting all their responsibilities fulfilled, and they need a clean and safe workplace, and they don’t need further delays.  Good luck and successful exterminating to everyone working on the problem!

North Carolina Laws require the NC Division of Motor Vehicles to revoke an underage person’s license as required by G.S. 20-17.3 for violating various provisions of the alcoholic beverage regulations including aiding and abetting and attempting to violate certain regulations.  However, there are ways to legally avoid the revocation of your license if you are accused of violating these regulations.  Call Collins Law Firm for a consultation if you have any questions or need legal representation at:  910-793-9000.

Selected relevant statutes include:

North Carolina Statutes, Chapter 20. Motor Vehicles, § 20-17.3. Revocation for underage purchasers of alcohol

The Division shall revoke for one year the driver’s license of any person who has been convicted of violating any of the following:  (1) G.S. 18B-302(c), (e), or (f):  (2) G.S. 18B-302(b), if the violation occurred while the person was purchasing or attempting to purchase an alcoholic beverage; (3) G.S. 18B-302(a1).

If the person’s license is currently suspended or revoked, then the revocation under this section shall begin at the termination of that revocation. A person whose license is revoked under this section for a violation of G.S. 18B-302(a1) or G.S. 18B-302(c) shall be eligible for a limited driving privilege under G.S. 20-179.3.

North Carolina Statutes, Chapter 18B. Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages, Article 3. Sale, Possession, and Consumption, 18B-302. Sale to or purchase by underage persons

(a) Sale. – It shall be unlawful for any person to: (1) Sell malt beverages or unfortified wine to anyone less than 21 years old; or (2) Sell fortified wine, spirituous liquor, or mixed beverages to anyone less than 21 years old.

(a1) Give. – It shall be unlawful for any person to: (1) Give malt beverages or unfortified wine to anyone less than 21 years old; or (2) Give fortified wine, spirituous liquor, or mixed beverages to anyone less than 21 years old.

(b) Purchase, Possession, or Consumption. – It shall be unlawful for: (1) A person less than 21 years old to purchase, to attempt to purchase, or to possess malt beverages or unfortified wine; or (2) A person less than 21 years old to purchase, to attempt to purchase, or to possess fortified wine, spirituous liquor, or mixed beverages; or (3) A person less than 21 years old to consume any alcoholic beverage.

(c) Aider and Abettor. (1) By Underage Person. – Any person who is under the lawful age to purchase and who aids or abets another in violation of subsection (a), (a1), or (b) of this section shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. (2) By Person over Lawful Age. – Any person who is over the lawful age to purchase and who aids or abets another in violation of subsection (a), (a1), or (b) of this section shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

(d) Defense. – It shall be a defense to a violation of subsection (a) of this section if the seller: (1) Shows that the purchaser produced a driver’s license, a special identification card issued under G.S. 20-37.7, a military identification card, or a passport, showing his age to be at least the required age for purchase and bearing a physical description of the person named on the card reasonably describing the purchaser; or (2) Produces evidence of other facts that reasonably indicated at the time of sale that the purchaser was at least the required age. (3) Shows that at the time of purchase, the purchaser utilized a biometric identification system that demonstrated (i) the purchaser’s age to be at least the required age for the purchase and (ii) the purchaser had previously registered with the seller or seller’s agent a drivers license, a special identification card issued under G.S. 20-377.7, a military identification card, or a passport showing the purchaser’s date of birth and bearing a physical description of the person named on the document.

(e) Fraudulent Use of Identification. – It shall be unlawful for any person to enter or attempt to enter a place where alcoholic beverages are sold or consumed, or to obtain or attempt to obtain alcoholic beverages, or to obtain or attempt to obtain permission to purchase alcoholic beverages, in violation of subsection (b) of this section, by using or attempting to use any of the following: (1) A fraudulent or altered drivers license. (2) A fraudulent or altered identification document other than a drivers license.

(3) A drivers license issued to another person. (4) An identification document other than a drivers license issued to another person. (5) Any other form or means of identification that indicates or symbolizes that the person is not prohibited from purchasing or possessing alcoholic beverages under this section.

(f) Allowing Use of Identification. – It shall be unlawful for any person to permit the use of the person’s drivers license or any other form of identification of any kind issued or given to the person by any other person who violates or attempts to violate subsection (b) of this section.

(g) Conviction Report Sent to Division of Motor Vehicles. – The court shall file a conviction report with the Division of Motor Vehicles indicating the name of the person convicted and any other information requested by the Division if the person is convicted of any of the following: (1) A violation of subsection (e) or (f) of this section. (2) A violation of subsection (c) of this section. (3) A violation of subsection (b) of this section, if the violation occurred while the person was purchasing or attempting to purchase an alcoholic beverage. (4) A violation of subsection (a1) of this section. Upon receipt of a conviction report, the Division shall revoke the person’s license as required by G.S. 20-17.3.

(h) Handling in Course of Employment. – Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an underage person from selling, transporting, possessing or dispensing alcoholic beverages in the course of employment, if the employment of the person for that purpose is lawful under applicable youth employment statutes and Commission rules.

(i) Purchase, Possession, or Consumption by 19 or 20-Year Old. – A violation of subdivision (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this section by a person who is 19 or 20 years old is a Class 3 misdemeanor.

(j) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, a law enforcement officer may require any person the officer has probable cause to believe is under age 21 and has consumed alcohol to submit to an alcohol screening test using a device approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. The results of any screening device administered in accordance with the rules of the Department of Health and Human Services shall be admissible in any court or administrative proceeding. A refusal to submit to an alcohol screening test shall be admissible in any court or administrative proceeding.

(k) Notwithstanding the provisions in this section, it shall not be unlawful for a person less than 21 years old to consume unfortified wine or fortified wine during participation in an exempted activity under G.S. 18B-103(4), (8), or (11).

How much is a companion pet worth? This is the question that is being asked in regards to the death of Laci, a Jack Russel Terrier of a Wilmington couple. Laci died in 2007 after veterinarians at NC State inserted a feeding tube in her trachea instead of her esophagus, causing Laci to drown over several hours. The Sheras filed a complaint in 2009 against the NC State Veterinary School, two veterinary residents and an intern who treated Laci. The couple accused them of malpractice. In their lawsuit the Sheras question whether the residents had the proper supervision while working in the intensive care unit.

The Sheras, Laci’s owners, are fighting a legal battle with the state over how much they are entitled from Laci’s death. The value of a companion animal is being calculated at the fair market value of replacing the animal which is not in line with the value that Americans place onto pets. Many state laws view animals as being a piece of property instead of another member of the family. There is an argument against this view based upon the legal system’s valuation of a companion animal not being in line with what an average pet owner is willing to spend in veterinary bills.

The Sheras have been fighting this view of compensation and the rights of animal owners over the loss or injury of an animal caused by another. The State estimates the cost of replacing Laci is only $350 based upon market value. The Sheras’ attorney argues that they are entitled to more than $350, that they should be compensated for more than $28,000, which was the cost of Laci’s cancer treatments at NC State.

The Sheras have made statements about this lawsuit not being about the money, but rather about this being justice for Laci and trying to change the system. They are hoping to change the law so that no other family or pet has to go through what they have been through.

On January 23rd, 2012, the Sheras’ case made it to the North Carolina state Court of Appeals but the decision is not expected for at least a few months. The Sheras’ case is just one of the recent court cases that essentially treat animals as human under the law. The United States Courts are deciding against centuries of legal decisions that have defined animals as property. In recent years Judges in 25 states have administered financial trusts set up in pets’ names as well as courts in New York, Maryland and Texas resolving custody disputes involving pets by deciding what’s best for the pet. The Courts have begun to take claims of veterinary malpractice seriously as well. Courts in Kentucky and California have awarded damages to pet owners for the loss of companionship, emotional distress and other factors that go beyond the assessed animal’s worth based upon their market value.

By Samantha Barringer, Intern at Collins Law Firm

On the evening of Friday, January 13, 2012, there were scenes of panic near the island of Giglio, Italy—the Costa Concordia, a luxury cruise ship, hit a sandbar causing a 165 feet gash across the ships left side.  The ship started taking on water forcing some 4,200 people aboard to evacuate.  Most people managed to reach the nearby island by lifeboats, others swam ashore, and some 50 people who were trapped on the badly listed ship were plucked to safety by helicopters.

Unfortunately, this accident claimed the lives of at least 16 people—21 more people remain listed as missing.

In addition, experts fear fuel could leak from the capsized cruise liner into the sea off the Italian coast.  After an unidentified liquid was found escaping from the holed cruise liner, Italy’s government declared a state of emergency.

The man accused of causing this disaster by steering the ship too close to the island’s shore and later abandoning the ship before evacuation was completed, Francesco Schettino, the captain of the ship, is under house arrest.

Costa Cruises, a daughter of the US Carnival Cruises, offered today in addition to a refund of the full costs of their cruise, travel expenses and any medical expenses sustained after the grounding a €11,000 (~$14,500) settlement to each passenger, whether child or adult, who suffered no physical injuries—injured passengers will be dealt with individually.

However, Codacons, an associations for the protection of the environment and the rights of users and consumers, did not participate in the negotiations, and is collecting names for a class action suit to be filed in Miami, Florida requesting €125,000 (~165,000) for each passenger.  Codacons’ president Carlo Rienzi even urges passengers to see a doctor to check whether they had suffered psychological trauma.

American advocates however argue that each passenger has different damages and needs to be dealt with individually.  Therefore, they do not see a class action to be the right tool and instead suggest for passengers to file individual lawsuits.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

On Friday, January 6, 2012 after a months long investigation by the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office (hereinafter NHSO), Vice and Narcotics Detectives seized the largest amount of heroin in NHSO history, and arrested Tierre Henderson.

The raid lead to the discovery of 300 small paper bags of heroin stamped “Breaking Dawn” and “Dream Catcher” which have a street value of more than $9,000, and diverse drug paraphernalia.

The  accused drug trafficker Tierre Henderson is now held in New Hanover County Detention Facility for four counts of possession with the intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver heroin, two counts of sale or delivery of heroin, two counts of conspiracy to trafficking in opium/heroin, four counts of  maintaining a dwelling, vehicle, or other place for the use, storage, or sale of a controlled substance, manufacture of heroin, four counts of trafficking in opium/heroin, and five counts of possession of drug paraphernalia.  He is held under a $2.5 million bond.  His next court appearance is schedule in New Hanover County District Court in Wilmington, North Carolina on January 19, 2012.

The investigation of Tierre Henderson also lead the Vice and Narcotics Detectives to Chrissy Joy Sinclair in her residence in Holly Ridge, where—with the assistance of the Holly Ridge Police Department—5.5 ounces of pure uncut heroin was seized which would produce over 15,000 bags of heroin on the streets of New Hanover County, along with drug paraphernalia, and $60,000 cash.

Chrissy Joy Sinclair is being held in the New Hanover County Detention Facility under a $1 million bond.  She is charged with five counts of conspiracy to trafficking in opium/heroin, two counts of maintaining a dwelling, vehicle, or other place for the use, storage, or sale of a controlled substance, and possession of drug paraphernalia.  Her next court appearance is schedule in New Hanover County District Court in Wilmington, North Carolina on January 26, 2012.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Every year, many people start off the New Year facing the consequences and expense of a DWI/DUI arrest.  Unfortunately, holiday festivities often even take a deadly turn when a person chooses to drink alcohol and then get behind the wheel.

In an effort to remove impaired drivers from the roads, State Transportation Secretary Gene Conti announced on December 2, 2011 that state and local law enforcement officers will be out in force as part of the Holiday “Booze It & Lose It” campaign.  Checkpoints and stepped-up patrols will be conducted through Monday, January 2, 2012 across North Carolina.  This means that an increased police presence is to be expected.

Collins Law Firm always urges people not to drive while impaired.  If you consume alcohol, we encourage you to have a designated driver or to take a taxi home.  However, if you are charged with a DWI/DUI, underage drinking, or any other crime in or around Wilmington, NC in New Hanover County, Brunswick County (Bolivia, NC), or Pender County (Burgaw, NC) and need a lawyer or attorney to represent you, call Collins Law Firm at: 910-793-9000 for a confidential consultation.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

On Wednesday, December 7, 2011 Rod Blagojevich was sentenced to 14 years in prison for18 corruption charges, including the scheme to peddle the vacated Senate seat of Barack Obama.  He will have to report for prison on February 16, 2012 to a facility to be named later.  In addition, he was ordered to pay a $20,000 fine.

Blagojevich was a democratic State Representative before being elected to the United States House of Representatives representing parts of Chicago, and he served as the 40th Governor of Illinois from 2003 to 2009.

Blagojevich was arrested on December 9, 2008 on federal corruption charges including conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery.  As a result thereof, he was impeached for corruption and misconduct in office by the Illinois House of Representatives on January 9, 2009 by a 114–1 vote.

With this sentence Blagojevich will join George Ryan, a Republican who was governor from 1999 to 2003, who is serving a prison sentence.  Ryan was convicted of corruption in 2006 after a scandal involving the illegal sale of government licenses, contracts and leases by state employees.

Two other former Illinois governors have been sent to prison, and several others have gotten in trouble with the law:  Otto Kerner Jr., a Democrat who was governor from 1961 to 1968, was convicted in 1973 on 17 counts of bribery, conspiracy, perjury and related charges, and Dan Walker, a Democrat who was governor from 1973 to 1977, pleaded guilty to bank fraud, misapplication of funds and perjury in 1987and was sentenced to seven years in prison.

However, with this 14 years sentence, Blagojevich received one of the stiffest penalties imposed for corruption in a state with a history of crooked politics.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

Effective for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2011 the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina has enacted a new, additional court cost specific to impaired driving offenses, which took effect on December 1, 2011.

Unlike most changes to court costs which were enacted during the past years and which typically took effect for costs assessed or collected on or after the effective date of the enacting legislation, this cost applies only to convictions for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2011. The fee may not be assessed for offenses committed prior to that date.

The new fee of $100 is to be assessed in addition to all other costs applicable to the case; it does not replace any other costs. E.g., it is assessed in addition to the Chapter 20 fee of G.S. 7A-304(a)(4b), not in lieu of it. The cost is to be assessed only upon conviction, so the fee should not be assessed unless the defendant is convicted of one of the following offenses:  Impaired driving, G.S. 20-138.1; Impaired driving in commercial vehicle, G.S. 20-138.2; Operating a commercial vehicle after consuming alcohol (second or subsequent convictions, only), G.S. 20-138.2A; and Operating a school bus, activity bus, or child care vehicle after consuming alcohol (second or subsequent convictions, only), G.S. 20-138.2B.

Because it is a court cost under G.S. 7A-304, waiver of this fee requires that the court make a finding of just cause for the waiver, pursuant to G.S 7A-304(a).

Collins Law Firm regularly represents people charged with impaired driving offenses with court appearances in New Hanover, Pender, and Brunswick County.  If you were charged, you should contact a lawyer or attorney at Collins Law Firm at 910-793-9000 for a consultation.

By Jana Collins, Office Manager

The road construction around Wilmington, North Carolina is supposed to ease traffic and pedestrian flow while improving the infrastructures of the city.  In the mean time the road closures and construction zones have been causing delays and traffic congestion.  In particular the construction on 3^rd Street in downtown Wilmington has been causing delays for those traveling into and out of downtown.

The construction and improvement project on 3^rd street in downtown Wilmington began in August and the project duration is expected to last for 13 months.  The project budget is $9.4 million, which was funded through a 2006 bond referendum.  The project is located from the stretch of road from Market Street to Davis Street and reflects the similar improvement projects on Front Street.  There are expected delays and slow downs due to the construction and renovation improvements.  There has already been one delay with the improvement project within the first few weeks of the project.  The delay is due to the discovery of an underground shelter with four storage tanks that are in the way of the new water and sewer lines that are being installed.  The old tanks contain liquids such as gas and oil, which require an environmental engineer to remove them which will cost $15,000 each to remove.  The money to remove the old tanks will come out of the project’s contingency fund and while the discovery of the tanks has delayed the project there is an expectation for it to be completed by September 2012.

The reason for this project is due to the aging water and sewer pipes that run underneath 3^rd street and to convert overhead utilities to run underground.  The above ground construction is to renovate the streetscape during the underground construction in order to minimize the disruption that will be caused during the construction period.

These renovations and updates are necessary due to various reasons.  The overhead utilities are being moved underground to reduce the potential for damage and to improve the aesthetics of the downtown cityscape.  The water and sewer pumps that run under 3^rd street are up to 100 years old in certain areas.  The traffic flow is planned to be improved through making downtown more accessible and pedestrian-friendly through improving the road which is considered a major gateway into the city.

Work hours expected for this project are 7 am until 6 pm, Mondays through Fridays with some construction on nights and weekends as deemed necessary.  Expect delays from lane closures on the west side of 3^rd street that have been extended to the Grace street intersection with no parking zones having been extended to the north of the Walnut Street intersection.  There are no left turns allowed off of 3^rd Street at Princess, Chestnut and Grace Streets with a detour for motorists to use 5^th Avenue.  Intersections along 3^rd Street may be closed as necessary.  Pedestrian access and walkways will be moved from in front of buildings as necessary with some temporary structures.

Written by Samantha Barringer – Intern with Collins Law Firm

On October 1st, 2011 more than 2,500 protesters marched across the Brooklyn Bridge.  Of those 2,500 protesters from the Occupy Wall Street (now sometimes called OWS) demonstration, more than seven hundred protesters were arrested by the police while trying to cross the Brooklyn Bridge.  Police defend their actions of arresting the protesters by saying the marchers’ actions led to the intervention.   Only those who were walking in the road portion of the bridge were arrested while those who used the Brooklyn Bridge walkway were not arrested.  The protesters who were walking in the street portion of the bridge were arrested due to the laws that were enacted to ensure reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on protests to prevent any unsafe conditions for the public.  By choosing to march in the street, demonstrators were creating a public safety hazard while also impeding the flow of traffic across the bridge.

The New York Police Department had warned protesters in the days preceding October 1st arrests.   The police department had issues several warnings to the protesters that walking in the roadway instead of on the pedestrian walkway, would lead to arrests of those who did not abide by the law.  Many of those who were arrested have since been released with a summons.

In the weeks since it began, the OWS protests have become violent.  Over a dozen New York Police Department officers have been injured in protest related incidents including five officers who were sent to a hospital for injuries including hand and ankle injuries, and at least one head trauma injury.   Injuries were sustained at events including marches in Times Square on Oct. 15, and on Oct. 14 when OWS protesters marched down Broadway from Zuccotti Park toward the New York Stock Exchange in a celebration of the postponing of the cleaning of the park by the owners – Brookfield Properties.  First Precinct Commander Edward Winski suffered an elbow injury after a protester fought with a deputy inspector while being arrested because they refused to move from the street to the sidewalk.  The protester was charged with resisting arrest, obstructing government administration, and criminal mischief.

Written by Samantha Barringer – Intern with Collins Law Firm